A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is put in its place.
If your DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and proceed according into the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners might seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.
However it's made apparent that police is free to just take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also guarantee regard from the family drop in accordance with legislation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. 9. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be reached. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case law in a particular court. Indeed, Every single circuit has its own set of binding case law. As a result, a judgment rendered from the Ninth Circuit will not be binding from the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
The different roles of case law in civil and common law traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the broader legal principles.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the acquired counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage will not be comprehensive, but this is an more info excellent starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.